DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
Application for the Correction of
the Coast Guard Record of:
BCMR Docket No. 2008-095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
FINAL DECISION
This proceeding was conducted under the provisions of section 1552 of title 10 and
section 425 of title 14 of the United States Code. The Chair docketed the case on March 21,
2008, upon receipt of the completed application, and assigned it to staff member J. Andrews to
prepare the decision for the Board as required by 33 C.F.R. § 52.61(c).
appointed members who were designated to serve as the Board in this case.
This final decision, dated December 17, 2008, is approved and signed by the three duly
APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS
The applicant, who was honorably released from active duty in the Coast Guard on
February 11, 2007, asked the Board to correct block 11 on his DD 214 to show that he had a job
while in the military and how long he was an MK3. The applicant alleged that he recently
applied for a federal government job and was told he was ineligible to be hired because his active
duty job experience did not appear in block 11.
The applicant’s DD 214 shows that he enlisted on August 12, 2002; attended MK “A”
School; advanced to machinery technician third class (MK3; pay grade E-4) on October 18,
2003; and was released to the Reserve on February 11, 2007, upon completion of his required
active service. Block 11 of his DD 214 contains the notation “NA” and many Xes.
VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD
On August 12, 2008, the Judge Advocate General of the Coast Guard submitted an
advisory opinion adopting the findings and analysis of the case provided in a memorandum
prepared by the Coast Guard Personnel Command (CGPC).
CGPC stated that DD 214s are prepared in accordance with the regulations published in
COMDTINST M1900.4D. The instructions in the manual stated that, for enlisted personnel,
block 11 should contain only the entry “NA.” CGPC pointed out that the applicant’s skill rating
and pay grade properly appear in blocks 4.a. and 4.b. of the DD 214. CGPC also pointed out that
the applicant did not submit anything to support his claim that he was improperly denied federal
employment because of the lack of information in block 11, which was completed in accordance
with regulation. Because entering information in block 11 for an enlisted member would violate
the regulation, CGPC recommended that the Board deny the applicant’s request.
APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD
On August 14, 2008, the Chair sent the applicant a copy of the views of the Coast Guard
and invited him to respond within 30 days. No response was received.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Chapter 1.E. of COMDTINST M1900.4D contains the following regulations for prepar-
ing DD 214s:
Block 4a. Grade, Rate, or Rank. Enter the abbreviation for grade or rate in which separated. The
commissioned grade will be shown for a temporary officer reverting to permanent enlisted status
for the purpose of retiring under the enlisted "20-year" bill and released from active duty effective
on the same date. In the case of a cadet, enter "CADET".
Block 4b. Pay Grade. Enter the pay grade in which separated: “O-4”, “W-1”, “E-3”, etc. For
cadets enter “NA”.
Block 11. Primary Specialty Number, Title and Years and Months in Specialty.
1. Enlisted Personnel. Enter "NA".
2. Officers. Enter the specialty or experience indicator as shown in current Register of Officers
(COMDTINST M1427.1 (series)), or the Register of Reserve Officers (COMDTINST M1427.2
(series)).
Block 12h. Effective Date of Pay Grade. Enter the year, month, and day as follows:
1. Enlisted Personnel. Date of advancement.
Block 14. Military Education. To assist the former service member in employment placement and
job counseling, those formal service schools and in-service training courses captured in PMIS/
JUMPS and successfully completed during the period of service covered by the form will be in
this block, e.g., medical and dental, electronics, supply administration, personnel, or heavy
equipment operations. Enter all course titles, number of weeks, and year completed, from the date
entered in block 12a through the date entered in block 12b.
● ● ●
● ● ●
● ● ●
Chapter 1.D.2.c.(2) of COMDTINST M1900.4D states that any large blocks of blank
space on the DD 214 should contain Xes.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The Board makes the following findings and conclusions on the basis of the applicant's
military record and submissions, the Coast Guard's submissions, and applicable law:
The Board has jurisdiction concerning this matter pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1552.
1.
The application is timely.
The applicant alleged that block 11 of his DD 214 is improperly prepared because
it fails to contain information about his job and how long he was in his rate. The Board begins
its analysis in every case by presuming that the disputed information in the applicant’s military
record is correct, and the applicant bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evi-
dence that the disputed information is erroneous or unjust. 33 C.F.R. § 52.24(b). The applicant
did not submit any evidence to prove that his DD 214 is erroneous. In addition, although he
alleged that he was ineligible for a federal job because of the lack of a substantive entry in block
11, he did not submit anything to prove this allegation of injustice.
Preparation of a DD 214 is governed by regulation. Chapter 1.E. of COMDTINST
M1900.4D clearly states that, for an enlisted member, block 11 should contain only the notation
“NA,” meaning that the block is inapplicable for an enlisted member. Apparently, because
enlisted members’ skill ratings are shown in block 4.a., block 11 is only completed for officers,
whose job skills are not revealed by the rank shown in block 4.a.
With the notation “NA” and many Xes, block 11 of the applicant’s DD 214 is
properly prepared in accordance with Chapters 1.E. and 1.D.2.c.(2) of COMDTINST M1900.4D.
In addition, the Board notes that the applicant’s rate of MK3 properly appears in block 4.a. of his
DD 214; his date of advancement to MK3 is properly shown in block 12.h.; and his military
education is shown in block 14. Therefore, the Board finds that the applicant has failed to prove
that his DD 214 is improperly completed.
3.
4.
2.
5.
Accordingly, the applicant’s request should be denied.
[ORDER AND SIGNATURES APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE]
The application of MK3 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, USCGR, for correction of his military
ORDER
Vicki J. Ray
George A. Weller
Janice Williams-Jones
record is denied.
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2010-017
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. On the applicant’s DD 214, block 4.a. The instructions in the manual state that, for enlisted personnel, block 11 should contain only the entry “NA.” The PSC pointed out that a member’s military education is properly shown in block 14 of a DD 214 and alleged that the applicant’s completion of 30 weeks of Electronics Technician School is...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2009-073
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. The veteran’s military records show that he was female when he served in the Coast Guard. Records of former servicemembers are filed based upon Social Security Number and the name of the veteran at the time of discharge.” APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On February 13, 2009, the Chair sent the applicant a copy of the...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2009-060
The veteran’s military records, which include a birth certificate, show that the veteran was born female and served in the Coast Guard with a female name.1 The applicant alleged that he is the veteran and that State courts have legally changed his gender to male and his name to the male name shown in the case caption. The applicant also submitted a copy of the court order that legally changed his gender to male and ordered the State to issue him a new birth certificate to reflect this...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2010-065
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. The record indicates that sometime after his 1970 discharge, the applicant changed his name from that in official military record to C___ J____ (there is no evidence of this name change in the military record). The records show that the applicant entered, served in, and was discharged from the Coast Guard under the name shown on his DD 214.
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2009-235
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. The veteran’s military records show that he was female when he served in the Coast Guard. Accordingly, the Board finds that the applicant’s request for correction of his military record should be denied because it is untimely and because it lacks merit.
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2007-172
This final decision, dated April 10, 2008, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, who retired from the Coast Guard on October 31, 1998, upon completing more than twenty years of active duty asked the Board to correct his final DD 214 by changing the date of his entry on active duty in block 12a from May 1, 1987, to May 1, 1978. CGPC stated that under COMDTINST M1900.4, block 12a on a DD 214 is supposed to show the “Date Entered Active...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2004-064
On June 9, 1999, the CO sent to Commander, Coast Guard Personnel Command (CGPC) his recommendation that the applicant be honorably discharged for unsuitabil- ity because of the two alcohol incidents. 1998-047, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board change the applicant’s separation code to JNC and his narrative reason for separation to “unacceptable conduct.” The Board found that the narrative reason for separation “alcohol rehabilitation failure” was...
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2012-123
§ 182(b) and (c)(1), a cadet who does not complete the course of instruction at the Coast Guard Academy may be transferred to the Reserve and “order[ed] to active duty for such period of time as the Secretary prescribes (but not to exceed four years).” Summary of Past Actions Month Sept. 2007 July 2009 June 2010 Feb. 2012 Action Enlisted for 6 years of active duty Discharged (DD 214) and reenlisted for 2 years Discharged (DD 214) and appointed a cadet Disenrolled, discharged (DD 214),...
CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2011-226
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. The veteran’s military records show that the veteran was born male and served in the Coast Guard with a male name.1 The applicant alleged that she is the veteran and that a State court has legally changed her name to the female name shown in the case caption. Furthermore, it should be noted that records of former service members are filed...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2007-038
This final decision, dated August 16, 2007, is approved and signed by the three duly RELIEF REQUESTED DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. The April 1, 2005, DD 214 shows that the applicant was assigned to a port security unit, but there is no evidence in her record to show that she performed any sea service between her date of entry on active duty, March 8, 2004, and her date of...